kode
01-03 02:04 PM
I'm hoping you give us tons of time for this. It takes a lot longer than I first imagined!
I agree. I'd need about a year or so :P
plus .. this will be my first attempt at pixel art :sleep:
I agree. I'd need about a year or so :P
plus .. this will be my first attempt at pixel art :sleep:
wallpaper 2011 LORD GANESH WALLPAPERS
glen
04-04 10:13 AM
IV Core Team, you guys are doing a great job. We will stick with you till our goals are met.
nixstor
01-22 06:12 PM
She cannot change to H1 until Oct 1 which is when the new quota of H1's will be available unless she is going to work for an exempt organization/company. In the latter case then she can apply directly now for H1 as long as she is still maintaining H4 status.
This is what I get from the new memo:
Immigration Policy and Procedural Memoranda (http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/PeriodsofAdm120506.pdf)
I hope this will help you.
andy
ofcourse she cannot change her status until oct 1st. How ever the sluice gates for the new h1 quota open on Apr 1st and will be gone in days. My question is Does she need her H4 approved to have her prospective employer file the I 129? (or) Can she just provide the notice of action she received for her H4 extension filing to show that she is maintaining status?
This is what I get from the new memo:
Immigration Policy and Procedural Memoranda (http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/PeriodsofAdm120506.pdf)
I hope this will help you.
andy
ofcourse she cannot change her status until oct 1st. How ever the sluice gates for the new h1 quota open on Apr 1st and will be gone in days. My question is Does she need her H4 approved to have her prospective employer file the I 129? (or) Can she just provide the notice of action she received for her H4 extension filing to show that she is maintaining status?
2011 Laxmi Ganesh Wallpaper
smuggymba
03-01 07:57 PM
Hello Folks,
I am on H1-B since Aug2009 and last year I transferred around 40K USD to parents. All these transfers were spread over the year in the denominations of 5K per transaction.(As and when I saved money).
My question is, do I have to pay taxes in US on this money transferred to India. I know that my parents don't have to but I am not sure about myself.
Any pointers in this regard will be highly appreciated. Thanks,
Good job with savings:D
No, you have already paid tax on it. I've been here since 2004 and have sent 12.5K USD to India and never paid tax.
I am on H1-B since Aug2009 and last year I transferred around 40K USD to parents. All these transfers were spread over the year in the denominations of 5K per transaction.(As and when I saved money).
My question is, do I have to pay taxes in US on this money transferred to India. I know that my parents don't have to but I am not sure about myself.
Any pointers in this regard will be highly appreciated. Thanks,
Good job with savings:D
No, you have already paid tax on it. I've been here since 2004 and have sent 12.5K USD to India and never paid tax.
more...
map_boiler
07-12 12:24 PM
Just trying to sum up the situation from USCIS perspective...
1) DOS releases July visa bulletin making all EB categories current (except for other workers)...hoping to force the USCIS to adjudicate cases and avoid wasting visa numbers as in previous years
2) This infuriates USCIS, and for whatever reasons (this has been debated enough already), they decide to use up all the FY2007 visa numbers in June itself and then force the DOS to revise the July bulletin in June itself...so no one can file in July.
3) Unfortunately, they run into issues going through with their plan of using up all visa numbers in June
4) July 1st and morning of July 2nd...they still are working frantically to use up the numbers to avoid new July filers. But by now, it is July already and they have failed in their original mission (see 2 above). Now they start panicking and do some dumb stuff (in violation of their own regulations). They approve I-485's of some folks who were ready for approval (processing complete and FBI check cleared), but whose dates were not current. They also pre-requested some numbers for folks whose dates were current, but processing was not complete i.e. FBI check was not cleared.
5) Late morning July 2nd: By requesting all available numbers from DOS and exhausting FY2007 quota, they forced DOS to revise the July bulletin, which was unprecedented.
6) July 5th and later: It is now post July-2nd, and USCIS still has cases for which they pre-requested numbers. Now the problem is that even if the FBI check comes through for those cases, they cannot approve them because technically, all numbers have been used up for FY 2007. So they start returning numbers to DOS. They also decide NOT the send the applications of people who filed on July 2nd or later back while they decide on the next course of action...
I think this will have major implications for both USCIS and DOS. The key for USCIS was to exhaust visa numbers on or before June 29th to achieve their obejective without repercussions...and force DOS to revise the bulletin in June itself...and they failed miserably at it.
And now they will have to pay. I know some people are thinking please let USCIS just sweep it under the carpet and just allow us to file our cases...no harm done. But I diasgree...what they have done is shameful. And they should be made to pay for playing with our lives. They should never be able to even think of doing something like this again. And their operations should have direct congress/DOS oversight so they cannot get away with snail-paced processing wasting visas ever again...
1) DOS releases July visa bulletin making all EB categories current (except for other workers)...hoping to force the USCIS to adjudicate cases and avoid wasting visa numbers as in previous years
2) This infuriates USCIS, and for whatever reasons (this has been debated enough already), they decide to use up all the FY2007 visa numbers in June itself and then force the DOS to revise the July bulletin in June itself...so no one can file in July.
3) Unfortunately, they run into issues going through with their plan of using up all visa numbers in June
4) July 1st and morning of July 2nd...they still are working frantically to use up the numbers to avoid new July filers. But by now, it is July already and they have failed in their original mission (see 2 above). Now they start panicking and do some dumb stuff (in violation of their own regulations). They approve I-485's of some folks who were ready for approval (processing complete and FBI check cleared), but whose dates were not current. They also pre-requested some numbers for folks whose dates were current, but processing was not complete i.e. FBI check was not cleared.
5) Late morning July 2nd: By requesting all available numbers from DOS and exhausting FY2007 quota, they forced DOS to revise the July bulletin, which was unprecedented.
6) July 5th and later: It is now post July-2nd, and USCIS still has cases for which they pre-requested numbers. Now the problem is that even if the FBI check comes through for those cases, they cannot approve them because technically, all numbers have been used up for FY 2007. So they start returning numbers to DOS. They also decide NOT the send the applications of people who filed on July 2nd or later back while they decide on the next course of action...
I think this will have major implications for both USCIS and DOS. The key for USCIS was to exhaust visa numbers on or before June 29th to achieve their obejective without repercussions...and force DOS to revise the bulletin in June itself...and they failed miserably at it.
And now they will have to pay. I know some people are thinking please let USCIS just sweep it under the carpet and just allow us to file our cases...no harm done. But I diasgree...what they have done is shameful. And they should be made to pay for playing with our lives. They should never be able to even think of doing something like this again. And their operations should have direct congress/DOS oversight so they cannot get away with snail-paced processing wasting visas ever again...
sjhugoose
February 4th, 2004, 08:09 PM
The failure of the D2H to be even remotely competitive with the 1D Mk 11 even though both cameras had similar development cycles is simply a embarrassment.
But Pope I thought 4 MP is all PJ's want ;)
But Pope I thought 4 MP is all PJ's want ;)
more...
gc_dreamer_485
10-10 04:09 PM
Guys,
I spoke to another Border Post official and he suggested that i drive uptp the nearest border and they would refuse my entry to Canada as i don't have a valid visa and i can turn around and come back to US and i can get a new I-94. Do you think it would be safe to do this ?
Any advice?
I spoke to another Border Post official and he suggested that i drive uptp the nearest border and they would refuse my entry to Canada as i don't have a valid visa and i can turn around and come back to US and i can get a new I-94. Do you think it would be safe to do this ?
Any advice?
2010 wallpaper of ganesh laxmi.
mali03
05-24 02:41 PM
Sent!
more...
qplearn
10-10 10:18 AM
does that mean no beer!! :-))
Yes, all the beer you want my friend, but just wait until I get another job. :)
I really need to thank you from the bottom of my heart, bcuz this was just the right moment for me to get this piece of information (I was under the impression that although you can keep your PD, you have to do labor, I-140 again.) For some reason, I had kept hearing a lot of mixed messages about AC21.
I just confirmed all this with my lawyer as well.
qplearn
Yes, all the beer you want my friend, but just wait until I get another job. :)
I really need to thank you from the bottom of my heart, bcuz this was just the right moment for me to get this piece of information (I was under the impression that although you can keep your PD, you have to do labor, I-140 again.) For some reason, I had kept hearing a lot of mixed messages about AC21.
I just confirmed all this with my lawyer as well.
qplearn
hair wallpapers god ganesha
pappu
09-19 07:23 AM
Friends , I was enquiring about Connecticut , but I am pleased to know about all the states.
beppenyc , Do you get your license till I-94 date or beyond it in NYC. Also my wife has the international driving permit , will that help?
Also will it be good idea to collect this info and publish it so that all of us know the rules and regulations of each state , this will help people immensely in situtaions like I am in ?
There are no hassles for DL renewal in CT. you will be ok.
beppenyc , Do you get your license till I-94 date or beyond it in NYC. Also my wife has the international driving permit , will that help?
Also will it be good idea to collect this info and publish it so that all of us know the rules and regulations of each state , this will help people immensely in situtaions like I am in ?
There are no hassles for DL renewal in CT. you will be ok.
more...
alien007
04-11 04:11 PM
thanks bugsbunny!
hot wallpaper of ganesh laxmi. ganesh lakshmi Source for free laxmi ganesh lord
rc0878
09-19 08:47 AM
Nope, no FP notice for me yet. I am still waiting on the receipts, however, I was able to get the Receipt# by calling USCIS few days back.
Any FP notices for folks falling in this category?
Please keep updating..thanks all !
Any FP notices for folks falling in this category?
Please keep updating..thanks all !
more...
house wallpaper of ganesh laxmi. Godess, laxmi picture, indain rama wallpapers,
dpsg
04-04 01:18 AM
I am really sad to see people questioning IV core members who have sacrificed so much for just a article in WSJ where legal immigration is not mentioned by lobbyist.I feel really bad that they have to prove themselves day in..day out.
I am starting this thread to show support ,appreciate and thank them for great work they have done selflessely.
Please add kind words for these guys If You support them to recognize their great work with words of encouragement.
I am starting this thread to show support ,appreciate and thank them for great work they have done selflessely.
Please add kind words for these guys If You support them to recognize their great work with words of encouragement.
tattoo wallpaper of ganesh laxmi. and more Wallpapers ganesh
omahaguy
04-09 04:15 PM
I got RFE through attorney. It is asking following details
1. Emloyment verification letter with present and intended permanent employer
2. Last two months pay slips
3. "Although your I 140 petitioner indicated in your initial I485 filing that you were employed by company A at that time, your Form G325 indicated that you were employed by company B and you were authorized by B at that time, please explain discrepancy"
I am bit worried about question 3. I worked for company A and labor, I140 applied when I was with A.
But during I485 filing I was with company B and in G325 I mentioned that.
It looks like company A by mistake mentioned that I was still with them.
I called my attorney he said its upto me decide which company I should work for.
But I am not sure company A provides an employment letter for me because I am working for comapny B now.
If B provides employment letter since it is >180 days since I 485 applied, will there be any issues?
Please give your opinions...
1. Emloyment verification letter with present and intended permanent employer
2. Last two months pay slips
3. "Although your I 140 petitioner indicated in your initial I485 filing that you were employed by company A at that time, your Form G325 indicated that you were employed by company B and you were authorized by B at that time, please explain discrepancy"
I am bit worried about question 3. I worked for company A and labor, I140 applied when I was with A.
But during I485 filing I was with company B and in G325 I mentioned that.
It looks like company A by mistake mentioned that I was still with them.
I called my attorney he said its upto me decide which company I should work for.
But I am not sure company A provides an employment letter for me because I am working for comapny B now.
If B provides employment letter since it is >180 days since I 485 applied, will there be any issues?
Please give your opinions...
more...
pictures Maa Laxmi With Lord Ganesh
HawaldarNaik
02-11 03:04 PM
EAD bole too....Daily Ticket
GC bole too....Quaterly Pass
Illegal Immigrant....without ticket...:).....freeloader
GC bole too....Quaterly Pass
Illegal Immigrant....without ticket...:).....freeloader
dresses wallpaper of ganesh laxmi.
canmt
11-20 09:09 AM
I received RFE on my 140 on nov 15th. I came to know about this when i checked the status online. It says on Nov 15th we mailed you a notice requesting further evidence . I-140 Receipt date is dec 11 2006. I do not yet know what the RFE is about. How many days does it take for the RFE to arrive normally ??
As USCIS sends out the RFE in regular mail, it takes about 4/5 business days to get it in hand. The lawyer and employer will add their buffer if they are busy or if the RFE is related to the employer, etc. The reason being once you know about the RFE you would get on top of them to send a response. They will use this opportunity to make bottom line money.
One good thing that USCIS had done is put time constraints on the RFE's (Though I don’t support this 100% as there are drawbacks). In earlier days the employer used to send response after 3/4 months so that they could delay the case as long as they can to have you tied down.
As I-140 is an employer's document, you might not have much say in this case. I suggest you to take it easy and watch out carefully in your benefit. Obtain a copy of the RFE before you do anything as there are lots of professional fraud lawyers out there who will do anything to make money.
I wish you good luck in your I-140 case.
As USCIS sends out the RFE in regular mail, it takes about 4/5 business days to get it in hand. The lawyer and employer will add their buffer if they are busy or if the RFE is related to the employer, etc. The reason being once you know about the RFE you would get on top of them to send a response. They will use this opportunity to make bottom line money.
One good thing that USCIS had done is put time constraints on the RFE's (Though I don’t support this 100% as there are drawbacks). In earlier days the employer used to send response after 3/4 months so that they could delay the case as long as they can to have you tied down.
As I-140 is an employer's document, you might not have much say in this case. I suggest you to take it easy and watch out carefully in your benefit. Obtain a copy of the RFE before you do anything as there are lots of professional fraud lawyers out there who will do anything to make money.
I wish you good luck in your I-140 case.
more...
makeup tattoo Ganesh Wallpaper
TeddyKoochu
05-12 10:03 AM
Below is data of PD from last four years for EB2-I - only for Jun, Jul & Aug.
Except July Fiasco , I don't see dates ever moving forward in July VB; but they do move in August VB.
Has anything changed in spillover laws in last 1 year - which will explain this no movement in July but in August?
Jun 06 : 01JAN03 | July 06 : 01JAN03 | August 06 : U ---> No change in July. Aug backward
Jun 07 : 01APR04 | July 07 : C | August 07 : U ---> July Fiasco
Jun 08 : 01APR04 | July 08 : 01APR04 | August 08 : 01JUN06 ---> No change in July. Aug forward
Jun 09 : 01JAN00 | July 09 : 01JAN00 | August 09 : 01OCT03 ---> No change in July. Aug forward
Jun 10 : 01FEB05 | July 10 : ?????? | August 10 : ???? ---> Do your really expect forward movement in July?
Thnks for your trend analysis, I believe you are correct.
Except July Fiasco , I don't see dates ever moving forward in July VB; but they do move in August VB.
Has anything changed in spillover laws in last 1 year - which will explain this no movement in July but in August?
Jun 06 : 01JAN03 | July 06 : 01JAN03 | August 06 : U ---> No change in July. Aug backward
Jun 07 : 01APR04 | July 07 : C | August 07 : U ---> July Fiasco
Jun 08 : 01APR04 | July 08 : 01APR04 | August 08 : 01JUN06 ---> No change in July. Aug forward
Jun 09 : 01JAN00 | July 09 : 01JAN00 | August 09 : 01OCT03 ---> No change in July. Aug forward
Jun 10 : 01FEB05 | July 10 : ?????? | August 10 : ???? ---> Do your really expect forward movement in July?
Thnks for your trend analysis, I believe you are correct.
girlfriend hairstyles wallpaper of ganesh laxmi. wallpaper of ganesh laxmi. wallpaper
rockstart
06-18 12:55 PM
Your responsiblity with time sheet ends once it has been approved by your manager. The payment rules between Client -> Primary Vendor -> Your Consulting firm is not your busiess. Tell him straight that Once you fax an approved time sheet you should get that money irrespective of whether they got the money or not.
Also define the reasonable period . I think 2 weeks is fine any thing more is not acceptable.
Also define the reasonable period . I think 2 weeks is fine any thing more is not acceptable.
hairstyles laxmi ganesh wallpapers
mzdial
June 4th, 2004, 01:53 PM
I don't own a D70 or know of anyone, but sometimes I just wonder if it's the hands in control of the device that have a lack of experience and blame it on the equipment.
Rest assured that if that's the camera of your choosing, buy it and I'm sure that you will be fine most likely. There are plenty of happy D70 owners that you're NOT hearing from, they are out taking photos!
The Canon 10D was plagued by forum reports of backfocusing, and perhaps there were a few/some that exhibited this behavior. But the majority do not and with everything, there may be a few bad apples in the bunch.
Buy your gear and don't worry so much about the forum problems you read about. You have a warranty if something just happens to be not right.
-- Matt
Rest assured that if that's the camera of your choosing, buy it and I'm sure that you will be fine most likely. There are plenty of happy D70 owners that you're NOT hearing from, they are out taking photos!
The Canon 10D was plagued by forum reports of backfocusing, and perhaps there were a few/some that exhibited this behavior. But the majority do not and with everything, there may be a few bad apples in the bunch.
Buy your gear and don't worry so much about the forum problems you read about. You have a warranty if something just happens to be not right.
-- Matt
garybanz
11-07 10:28 AM
You have three options
1) Talk to your employer and see if he is willing to support your I-140 while you are away on leave of absence, if he agrees then great!
2) Talk to your school and check if they will differ your admission by an year.
3) Go anyway...forget about US, you can do great in Europe or Asia too
1) Talk to your employer and see if he is willing to support your I-140 while you are away on leave of absence, if he agrees then great!
2) Talk to your school and check if they will differ your admission by an year.
3) Go anyway...forget about US, you can do great in Europe or Asia too
syzygy
06-14 08:48 PM
Divide & Rule -- did someone use this on us in past history and keep using it time and again?
No comments:
Post a Comment