dancing with stars audrina patridge

images Posted in audrina patridge

Audrina Patridge surprised by

Maverick1

10-30 12:22 PM

Just got my I-94 updated with the correct dates at the local airport - the CBP officer was very courteous and immediately knew what was to be done.

Thanks for taking time to post the resolution. Should be helpful for others.

---

wallpaper Audrina Patridge surprised by

Audrina Patridge Dancing With

babu123

04-01 02:34 PM

Congratulations.

---

Audrina Patridge (the hot

ravi98

09-24 10:37 AM

The GOP "Pledge": What's Not In It | Mother Jones (http://motherjones.com/mojo/2010/09/gop-pledge-whats-not-it)

The House Republicans on Thursday released a manifesto outlining what they intend to do should they triumph in the coming congressional elections. The glossy document, which is adorned with photographs of the Statue of Liberty, Mt. Rushmore, and cowboys, is high-mindedly titled "A Pledge to America: A New Governing Agenda Built on the Priorities of Our Nation, the Principles We Stand For & America's Founding Values." And it offers few surprises: tax cuts for all (including the super-rich), slashing federal spending (without specifying actual targets), downsizing government, more money for the military (especially missile defense), and repealing the health care bill.

You can read it yourself. Or peruse the reviews:......But here's a short-cut for you. Below is a list of words and phrases and the number of times they are each mentioned in the 45-page "Pledge."

Wall Street: 0
Bank: 0
Finance: 0
Mortgage crisis: 0
Derivative: 0
Subprime: 0
Lobbying: 0
Lobbyist: 0
K Street: 0
Campaign finance: 0
Campaign contribution: 0
Campaign donation: 0
Disclosure: 0
Climate change: 0
Environment: 1 ("political environment")
Alternative energy: 0
Renewable: 0
Green: 0
Transportation: 0
Infrastructure: 0
Poverty: 0
Food: 0
Food safety: 0
Housing: 0
Internet: 0
Education: 0
College: 0
Reading: 0
Science: 0
Research: 0
Technology: 0
Bush administration: 0

That list is as telling as the actual contents.

---

2011 Audrina Patridge Dancing With

I was not a fan of Audrina#39;s

gc_dedo

09-22 06:03 PM

9/24/2008

Full Committee
1:00 P.M. in 2141 Rayburn House Office Building

Continued Committee Markup of: H.R. 6598, H.R. 5882, H.R. 5924, H.R. 5950, and
To consider: a resolution and report recommending to the Hous of Representatives that Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey be cited for contempt of Congress

---

more...

Posted in audrina patridge

angelfire76

12-19 02:21 PM

Given the hopelessness of the situation in March, switched jobs and was unable to file labor for a variety of reasons. Now everyday I see people come over and tell me how they plan to switch jobs once the 6 month mandated hibernation is over...I feel like breaking something. Lot of them have even stopped working, confident that a new job awaits :mad:
8 years of paying taxes in this country and not even a piece of plastic to show for it. :mad:

---

Audrina Patridge - #39;Dancing

gbof

10-25 03:14 PM

My case is very straight-forward but some really inefficient guy is making it complicated. I need your experience and inputs. Please do advise.

I came to US on J-1 in 2000. After 3-years on J-1 got 'waiver (i-612)" and then moved on to H1B visa and filed I-485 in july07 (with an approved I-140). I have stayed with the same university medical school (my GC sponsor) since 2000. Last month, I got a simple RFE --asking for a copy of approval notice of 'waiver' . Same was sent within a day and it followed with several LUDs and read rfe response received.....

Last week, got 'Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID)' for myself and same/ditto for my derivative-spouse. It is asking both of us to provide evidence/ IAP-66 and H1B approvals to prove our legal status from 2000 to 2006 (Please, note they asked only until 2006 and not until today). I have IAP-66 and H1B approvals ready to respond to this.

My Question is: Since my spouse/derivative was my dependant and was on J-2 visa, the IAP-66 were all in my name how should we respond to derivative's noid as-far-as IAP-66 approvals are concerned. We know IAPs and waiver are good for dependants and I want to end this back-and-forth with my response to uscis.

Please, advise and let me know of your thoughts....

---

more...

Dancing with the Stars-that

gsc999

09-20 07:17 PM

http://picasaweb.google.com/kannansm/ImmigartionVoiceDCRally18Sep07/photo#5111764333601260802

The guy in black shirt/pant is he a IV member? Next to him is definitely an american Kid. If they indeed are american citizens that listened to our cause and joined the rally, hats off to them.
---
Yes, thats them. Thanks for the find.

IVers do you see my point, Americans are very understanding people. If you can explain your case then they will join you and make you stronger.

Cheers!

---

2010 Audrina Patridge (the hot

Posted in audrina patridge

rk07

09-20 10:15 PM

Seshu,

Which center did you file, is it NSC? If so, on what date.

I applied on 23 July at NSC and havent received anything so far.

Thanks,
-rk.


I got my checks cashed today and got ALL receipt numbers.

485 sent to NSC whereas AP and EAD stay in CSC. All have receipt numbers starting with WAC.

I saw from the previous post that EADs are being ordered within 6 days. is that true?

Application Type: I765, APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT AUTHORIZATION

Current Status: Case received and pending.

On September 17, 2007, we received this I765 APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT AUTHORIZATION, and mailed you a notice describing how we will process your case.

---

more...

Audrina Patridge at #39;Dancing

DDLMODES

07-13 01:19 PM

I hope that never, ever, ever happens. Actually, I'm sure it never will. :p

I second that !

And also I don't see how that will solve anything. Visa #'s are the problem not the distribution of the #'s.

;)

---

hair I was not a fan of Audrina#39;s

Audrina Patridge at #39;Dancing

sandiboy

09-20 08:15 PM

I just received an email from USCIS that my wife's EAD has been approved.

RD 07/02, FP 09/04, PD 05/06

Is this a LINxxx or a SRCxxx case number?

---

more...

Audrina Patridge will help wax

gcdreamer05

01-26 05:19 PM

This year i believe it is not based on SSN, is it not whether you are filing jointly or single ?
Since it is going to be a tax rebate rather than a stimulus , folks am i right here ?

---

hot Posted in audrina patridge

Audrina on Dacing With the

perm2gc

10-04 04:58 PM

Hello gg_ny,
It is too scary.. Plz note that the surname change is after mariz.. As per our convention, after mariz, wife's surname changes to that of husbands.. We have the mariz certificate with us.
Is this still that major problem, as earlier explained by you?
you are in serious trouble beyond your knowledge..consult a good attorney to correct it..
Dont waste time on boards...

---

more...


house VIDEOS. Audrina Patridge - New

Audrina Patridge - Dancing

fromnaija

05-06 07:04 PM

I was wondering how L1 can be allowed instate tuition while H1-B's have to pay out of state according to the Arizona list. What exactly is the fundamental difference between the 2 which results in L1's fulfilling the requirements?

GCard Dream - You should ask the question - what part of the statute does L1 fulfil that H1B does not -

I'm sure you can give these guy's a run for their money. One thing - if you pursue it long and hard enough I think there is a chance that you can get instate tuition. The only area I was concerned about was the domicile part but if L1's can prove domicile so can H1-B's.

I already fought this for three good years! I don't know how they allow L1 to enjoy in-state tuituion and not H1B. I provided links to USCIS website to ASU to prove that L1 and H1 are similar non-immigrant visa. I gave up after they could not provide any reasonable response.

---

tattoo Audrina Patridge - #39;Dancing

Dancing with the Stars season

Vic

11-20 08:49 AM

It could take anywhere from a few days to a couple of weeks. For me - it was around 2.5 weeks from the time the status changed to "we received your response....". Plus with the Thanksgiving break - it might take a bit longer. The best thing to do here is just not to worry about it and just wait...since its no longer in your hands.

Good luck...

---

more...


pictures Dancing with the Stars-that

audrina patridge.JPG

anilsal

12-01 06:53 PM

Babu, thanks for confirming that this stupid rule is in fact true. I always wonder how USCIS gets crafty in making new rules.

It will be easier to just get the stamping done in INDIA. That way, will get stamp till 2010.

---

dresses Audrina on Dacing With the

Former star of MTV#39;s The Hills

sanju

04-04 02:31 PM

To be frank, I was not aware of this loophole used by L1s so it came as a shock to me when I came to know of it. Anyways complaining will not take us far, action will. I will call my lawmakers. Does anyone have a list of lawmakers based on state or city.

Thank you ss_col.


This thread has lots of information about calling lawmakers:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=3814

Please request your spouse and friends to calls lawmakers.

---

more...


makeup Audrina Patridge at #39;Dancing

VIDEOS. Audrina Patridge - New

pappu

12-26 11:27 AM

OK so I was the original poster that spoke about my friend. Now I will give you some insight into my own case. I have been now in the US since 1991(though my PD is August 2001). Here are some details

Jan 1991 : Arrived in US as 19 yr old after completing Diploma in Engineering from India (10 plus 3).

1991- 1996: Took 5 yrs to complete 4 yrs degree as I was paying my own way. Working full time and studying full time on F1 visa.

1996 -1998 : Completed MBA. This time situation was better because I had financial aid and in state tuition.

1998-1999: Completed internship at an Investment Bank. Had to find another job because I Bank didnt want to do H1. Have been at current job since 1999.

2001: CVompany policy was to wait 2 yrs before applying for GC. So finally filed labor in 2001.

2005 : Labor finally approved from BEC. I 140 filed and approved.

June 2007 : 485 filed (as a 36 yr old)
You are here since a very long time.

If rules can be proposed in CIR for undocumented allowing them to get a greencard if they can prove they are here for minimum X number of years, similar rules can be created for legal documented immigrants (like yourself) too. Its just that the legal immigrant community is not united and does not have enough power yet to raise the voice.

---

girlfriend Dancing with the Stars season

Dancing With The Stars: Alum

gimme_GC2006

04-09 09:49 PM

Hello Everyone,

Hi I am a student in United States and I was on Optional Practical Training from Jan 2008 to Dec 2008. As I finished my OPT in Dec 2008 I joined again in New course for M.S in soft. Eng.

In the month of November I got a job in California through an employer, who is based in New Jersey. As I got a job the employer asked me to sign a contract which states that I will be paid 60,000 per year and I shouldn't work with his clients for 1 year after the agreement is terminated.

As the project was only for 40 days I finished it successfully and I my employer couldnt find me another job till now. So I decided to work on my own when I got an opportunity with the previously worked vendor, when my employer came to know about this he has threatened me to sue me. Then I retrieved from the opportunity but now even my employer doesnt pay me anything. It is been 4 months, he hasn't paid me anything , even he hasnt provided me any insurance.

I asked my employer couple of times to terminate my agreement otherwise I would go to Department of Labor and claim my wages but he downplays that by saying I am not on H1B so I will not be paid unless I am working with Client. But the agreement didn't say anything like that.
I have even asked him to run the payroll where I worked .I.e in California but he ran it in New Jersey. When I pointed this to him he said the payroll will be run at the residing state if the employee works more than 6 months.

We had an argument about this but he never replies to my emails he only calls me and says whatever he wants to say but when I ask him to put whatever he has said to me on phone in an email he doesnt reply at all.

And to mention, he doesnt have any documents of mine. I even didnt fill any I9 form, what ever he has is the only agreement that I signed and social security number that I emailed him to run my pay roll.

After the argument I even requested him to send my original agreement signed by two parties. I only had the agreement signed by me, he even didnt send me the agreement with his sign on it even after repeated requests.

Now he doesnt even care to answer my calls or emails. I am really tensed. I am getting opportunities from vendor that I worked with but I am afraid he would sue me. Please help me What to do. I am really really frustrated, tensed and I can't express how I feel right now.

I want to get out of the contract and work with the vendor if Possible.

Please explain me how can I tackle this problem?

I would be really very very thankful to you.

Thanks,
Uday

Dont worry he cannot do anything..all these scumbags, low-lifes and ponzi holes cannot do anything..

Trust me ..I have been there

Did you communicate to him emails ? do you have a proof of what all he said in emails?

Tell him that you will write to DHS, USCIS and all American consulates in India/US/Canada..that will be end of H1B approvals for him..

btw what's the company? dont be afraid of anything

---

hairstyles Audrina Patridge will help wax

Dancing With the Stars,Audrina

gagbag

06-14 09:06 PM

Any one

---

BharatPremi

12-09 12:12 AM

My 6th year H1B is expiring on April 28, 2008. I applied labor through PERM on October 2, 2007. I got the audit letter on December 3, 07. This audit letter does not state anything about the issue of the audit letter. However, the sentence �The job duties and/ or requirements are beyond those defined for the job by SOC/ O*Net code an Occupation Title provided by the State Workforce Agency� is highlighted in this letter. The letter also request for Business Necessity Letter and Recruitment Report. My case is the EB2 case for a Project Manager position with a minimum of 2 years working experience. A couple of programs and knowledge in the field are also required for this position. At the recruitment times, there are no applicants applied to this position. The company has approximately 16 employees including me.

I�m very confused and not sure what to do because my lawyer refused to answer any question. In my case that the Labor Certification is still pending (under audit) and my H1B is expiring in April, I wonder if I should start taking vacation now or go to work in another country for approximately 6-7 months and come back later to use the rest of my H1B until October 2, 08 to meet 365 days period? After October 2, 08, I can then start filing the H1B Extension for 1 year. Or should I wait until my I-140 approved and come back around October 2, 08 and do the H1B Extension for another 3 years? Or should I stay in US until April, 08 and take vacation until October, 08 and then comeback around October, 08 to file H1B extension? Also, do I still have to be employ full time with my current employer during this whole period? Can the job only be part time? Also, do I have to get pay the whole time from my current US employer during this whole period? Thank you very much for your help.

Highlighted area is the problem. Is your lawyer recently graduated? EB2 category is meant for minimum 5 years experience and whne your title is having the word "manager" it becomes more stricter definition.... In my opinion EB2 is always about minimum 5 years experience and that is where your lawyer screwed you. And yes the reason highlighted in the audit letter is real reason and it is direct indication of this conflict.

---

DallasBlue

07-05 12:19 AM

here you go...


Reversal Frustrates
Green-Card Applicants
By MIRIAM JORDAN
July 5, 2007; Page A2

The government's surprise offer, then abrupt reversal, of an opportunity for thousands of skilled foreign workers to obtain permanent residency in the U.S. highlights the problems of the overtaxed immigration system and the frenzy that results from a chance to apply for a green card.

The scramble has put tens of thousands of workers and their families in limbo after many of them and their employers spent thousands of dollars in hopes of securing permanent residency. It may result in a class-action lawsuit against the government by frustrated applicants.

The problem began on June 12 when the government seemed to open the door for thousands of foreign workers and their families to end the long wait to apply for a green card. That is when the State Department published a Visa Bulletin, which is a monthly notice closely watched by immigration attorneys and their clients because it determines who is eligible to file a green-card application the next month. The June bulletin announced that practically all skilled foreign workers who had been previously deemed eligible for an employer-sponsored visa could now take the final step of applying for a green card.

By law, the U.S. can issue about 140,000 employment-based green cards each year. Last year, the government fell short by about 10,000, despite the long waiting list; leftover visas cannot be rolled over to the next year. The June announcement aimed to prevent the visa slot from going to waste, according to a State Department spokeswoman.


The announcement was greeted with a mix of jubilation and panic by thousands of engineers, lab scientists and other high-skilled foreigners who had waited years for their place in line. Working ahead of a July 2 date for filing the application, intending immigrants rushed to gather documents, complete paperwork and obtain medical exams. Many of their dependents boarded planes for the U.S. to meet a requirement that all family members be present at the time of filing.

"The bulletin created a land rush among legal immigrants desperate to finalize their green-card applications," said Steve Miller, a Seattle-based immigration attorney.

Then, on July 2, the State Department issued an "update" that reversed the previous bulletin. It stated, effective immediately, there would be no further authorizations for employment-based cases. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, which processes the applications, said it would instead simply process existing applications to meet this year's quota. "We already had sufficient applications pending without new applicants...," a spokesman said.

Mike Aytes, head of domestic operations for the USCIS, said all 147,141 employment-based green cards have now been issued for the year.

Write to Miriam Jordan at miriam.jordan@wsj.com

---