newxyz100
07-19 02:10 PM
My Lawyer does whatever my employer tells him. They never give any receipt notice or approval notice to employees.
They did not even let me file my EAD and AP along with I-485.
I can file EAD/AP myself but I'm worried they might not give me the receipt notice of my I-485 filed in july, in a last ditch effort to prevent me from fleeing(I don't yet have any intention btw) or atleast make it difficult for me.
I'm sure there would be many in this situation.
Any thoughts what can be done?
IF you have used your personal checks the receipt is usually at the back of the checks. Esle just call the help desk and give all your information and if the guy is in good mood he can provide you the receipt number.
They did not even let me file my EAD and AP along with I-485.
I can file EAD/AP myself but I'm worried they might not give me the receipt notice of my I-485 filed in july, in a last ditch effort to prevent me from fleeing(I don't yet have any intention btw) or atleast make it difficult for me.
I'm sure there would be many in this situation.
Any thoughts what can be done?
IF you have used your personal checks the receipt is usually at the back of the checks. Esle just call the help desk and give all your information and if the guy is in good mood he can provide you the receipt number.
wallpaper 2011 Justin Bieber Shirt Off.
bomber
08-07 07:15 PM
I-485 is your application. Employer must provide receipt notices. Talk to your lawyer, he'll help you. You can call USCIS and get receipt notice.
To answer your question, I'm not that expert.
"Talk to your lawyer, he'll help you"..... not really..
My lawyer told me he will not provide receipt notice without employer's permission and employer has refused to grant permission.."
Don't know if calling USCIS and asking for a receipt notice will help if I already have an attorney authorized to represent ME through G-28...
Won't they send it to the attorney on record again?
To answer your question, I'm not that expert.
"Talk to your lawyer, he'll help you"..... not really..
My lawyer told me he will not provide receipt notice without employer's permission and employer has refused to grant permission.."
Don't know if calling USCIS and asking for a receipt notice will help if I already have an attorney authorized to represent ME through G-28...
Won't they send it to the attorney on record again?
georchen
09-14 06:52 AM
When did you file?
Sorry to answer you question late.
I am the July 2nd filer as well. It took me quite some time to figure out the case numbers on back of the checks. All start with "WAC" means California Servcie Center. After I entered my cases number each of each (total 6 of them, 3 for my wife and 3 for me). On Sept 13. there was LUD on all of cases. but only the contents differences were appeared on two 485 cases. It said that "we transferred this I485 APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS to our LINCOLN, NE location for processing because they now have jurisdiction over the case.".
That is what I got so far. May God with us all!!!
Sorry to answer you question late.
I am the July 2nd filer as well. It took me quite some time to figure out the case numbers on back of the checks. All start with "WAC" means California Servcie Center. After I entered my cases number each of each (total 6 of them, 3 for my wife and 3 for me). On Sept 13. there was LUD on all of cases. but only the contents differences were appeared on two 485 cases. It said that "we transferred this I485 APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS to our LINCOLN, NE location for processing because they now have jurisdiction over the case.".
That is what I got so far. May God with us all!!!
2011 2010 ieber with his shirt off
Sachin_Stock
08-05 12:03 PM
I have 4 years degree with Masters. However, if you made through EB3 you should be able to get through EB2. Nevertheless, it is worth a try as gains are large. I understand there is a risk (no risk no gain).
I have just started the process and my labor is in process. I am filing with my current employer who filed my EB3 case. Green card is for future job so they are taking me for higher position say manger. My lawyer is making sure there is some kind of sync up with Eb3 labor and H1B application. They should be supporting the present labor application.
Your employer need to be supportive and should be willing to work with you that help a lot. They have added some managerial stuff and kind of technical lead. I have not used my experience with present employer.
To best of my knowledge, there is no impact to eb3 case.
Hope this help.
I don't think there's any relationship H1-application. H1's for current employment where as PERM labor is for future employment. Future meaning, after your 485 has been approved. One doesn't even need to be on H1 to proceed for Eb3 to Eb2 conversion.
I have just started the process and my labor is in process. I am filing with my current employer who filed my EB3 case. Green card is for future job so they are taking me for higher position say manger. My lawyer is making sure there is some kind of sync up with Eb3 labor and H1B application. They should be supporting the present labor application.
Your employer need to be supportive and should be willing to work with you that help a lot. They have added some managerial stuff and kind of technical lead. I have not used my experience with present employer.
To best of my knowledge, there is no impact to eb3 case.
Hope this help.
I don't think there's any relationship H1-application. H1's for current employment where as PERM labor is for future employment. Future meaning, after your 485 has been approved. One doesn't even need to be on H1 to proceed for Eb3 to Eb2 conversion.
more...
learning01
05-26 07:56 AM
28.
16 Republicans and 12 Democrats.
Here is the Chicago Tribune editorial on the Senate CIR bill.
The Senate's better vision
Published May 26, 2006
.............
The Senate on a 62-36 vote Thursday approved a far better plan.
...................
This issue is too important for such heavy-handed partisanship. If the House fails to compromise to get an immigration law, it will reinforce the broad public impression that this GOP-led Congress can't get anything done.
..................
Against long odds, the Senate has produced a comprehensive immigration bill that looks beyond the House's one-dimensional solution. It deserves to be considered in good faith in conference committee. Building on the lessons of 20 years of failed immigration policy, the Senate bill represents our best chance yet to finally set things right. It's time for negotiation, not noise.
Copyright � 2006, Chicago Tribune
LINK (http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-0605260222may26,1,7539910.story?coll=chi-opinionfront-hed) at ChicagoTribune.com
Here is my guess on who will be in Conference from Senate side.
Sen.Specter, Sen.Cornyn, Sen.Kyl, Sen.Sessions, Sen.Brownback, Sen.Graham, Sen.Grassley, Sen.Kennedy, Sen.Durbin, Sen.Feinstein, Sen.Leahy, Sen.Feingold
16 Republicans and 12 Democrats.
Here is the Chicago Tribune editorial on the Senate CIR bill.
The Senate's better vision
Published May 26, 2006
.............
The Senate on a 62-36 vote Thursday approved a far better plan.
...................
This issue is too important for such heavy-handed partisanship. If the House fails to compromise to get an immigration law, it will reinforce the broad public impression that this GOP-led Congress can't get anything done.
..................
Against long odds, the Senate has produced a comprehensive immigration bill that looks beyond the House's one-dimensional solution. It deserves to be considered in good faith in conference committee. Building on the lessons of 20 years of failed immigration policy, the Senate bill represents our best chance yet to finally set things right. It's time for negotiation, not noise.
Copyright � 2006, Chicago Tribune
LINK (http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-0605260222may26,1,7539910.story?coll=chi-opinionfront-hed) at ChicagoTribune.com
Here is my guess on who will be in Conference from Senate side.
Sen.Specter, Sen.Cornyn, Sen.Kyl, Sen.Sessions, Sen.Brownback, Sen.Graham, Sen.Grassley, Sen.Kennedy, Sen.Durbin, Sen.Feinstein, Sen.Leahy, Sen.Feingold
kaisersose
02-11 11:26 AM
After all these days it appears many people are still not clear about the difference between 485 processing times and priority date movement.
The two are completely different entities. When USCIS talks of backlogs they do not mean backlogs due to retrogression (PD unavailability). They are talking about the number of applications they received and the time it takes for them to process them.
When USCIS says it will clear the backlog by 2010, it means applications filed after that time will be processed in a timely manner (in less than 6 months). It does not mean that all the 485s before that time wil be approved. It only means these 485s will be processed and thrown into a cold sorage bin to be looked at again whenever the PD becomes available.
When retrogression started in 2005, EB2 India jumped forward by 6 months each visa bulletin. The reason was namecheck delays combined with the problem of Labors with Old PDd languishing in BECs. As both these problems have been eliminated now and also many EB3 filers from that time are switching over to EB2, it is highly unlikely that one will see wide movement in India EB2.
The two are completely different entities. When USCIS talks of backlogs they do not mean backlogs due to retrogression (PD unavailability). They are talking about the number of applications they received and the time it takes for them to process them.
When USCIS says it will clear the backlog by 2010, it means applications filed after that time will be processed in a timely manner (in less than 6 months). It does not mean that all the 485s before that time wil be approved. It only means these 485s will be processed and thrown into a cold sorage bin to be looked at again whenever the PD becomes available.
When retrogression started in 2005, EB2 India jumped forward by 6 months each visa bulletin. The reason was namecheck delays combined with the problem of Labors with Old PDd languishing in BECs. As both these problems have been eliminated now and also many EB3 filers from that time are switching over to EB2, it is highly unlikely that one will see wide movement in India EB2.
more...
Aah_GC
07-10 03:22 PM
Just a thought (dont have an answer for you) - why dont you get in touch with a good lawyer? The Murthy's, Khanna's et al?
Good luck!
Good luck!
2010 justin bieber shirt off pics.
hopefulgc
08-13 05:11 PM
I wanted to get an idea how many EB2 guys would be willing to visit DC to meet lawmakers to help out our EB3 brothers. Unquestionably all EB3 should be willing to visit. This is the chance to show that IV is indeed one.
Refering to this thread
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=20858
Refering to this thread
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=20858
more...
rajsand
10-04 11:29 AM
We cannot predict the future but we can predict with some given statistics!
If people who got their AP from NSC could just menion how long it took for them to receive ap document it would be statistical and we can there upon make some judgements !!
Noone is asking for exact dates from USCIS. We are all still very much in a limbo and this is just for getting some heads up!!
If people who got their AP from NSC could just menion how long it took for them to receive ap document it would be statistical and we can there upon make some judgements !!
Noone is asking for exact dates from USCIS. We are all still very much in a limbo and this is just for getting some heads up!!
hair justin bieber with his shirt
go_gc_way
06-22 07:43 PM
I think, if at all Minister is being planned to be met , it is better only few problems are presented to Minister.
PROBLEMS IN INDIA MAY DILUTE THE FOCUS. I think the following would be best to present ..
1) Retrogression.
2) Social Security Treaty.
Numbers justifying above data can do a lot good to explain the problem.
PROBLEMS IN INDIA MAY DILUTE THE FOCUS. I think the following would be best to present ..
1) Retrogression.
2) Social Security Treaty.
Numbers justifying above data can do a lot good to explain the problem.
more...
sjhugoose
February 4th, 2004, 08:56 PM
Absolutely, D70... looks like a good camera and nice features, but uglier then a hat full of spiders. It looks like the sigma! bit more effort in the body design department wouldn't have gone astray. Its the Volvo of the DSLR world.
Rueb am a sensing just a touch of animosity toward Nikon ;)
Rueb am a sensing just a touch of animosity toward Nikon ;)
hot justin bieber pics 2010.
learning01
04-13 04:50 PM
Each of us have a decent and true story. It has been a struggle here in US for all of us.
I spent a life's fortune and emigrated to Canada with wife and 2 grown up kids. In early 1999, a large multinational from Netherlands (think of TVs, bulbs and fans) lured me and others into coming to US on H1. They promised they will apply for permanent residency in 6 months. The company couldn't survive the consultancy business and folded operations by end 2000 and my application evaporated into the air.
Post 9/11, and at the height of tech and internet bubble, I was laid off by that company in their operations closing in late 2001. I also lost my Canadian permanent residency (because I stayed away from that country form more that 180 days). I was lucky enough to get a decent job in late 2001. This large global company is a gem of its own; they also promised they will apply GC in 3 months. Thus my PD is EB3 Nov 2001.
I am always for writing one's experiences so that others know how to avoid them, if they are smart enough. That's all I have got.
Hi Learning01,
I did not want to "steal" your idea about publicity of the problem back in our countries. I just developed and enhanced the idea :-)
And I do not think we should be ashamed of the fact that this great country screwed us and made more than half a million highly educated and trained people (spouses included) chasing for a decade a mirage called GC and looking like idiots.
....
:-)
I spent a life's fortune and emigrated to Canada with wife and 2 grown up kids. In early 1999, a large multinational from Netherlands (think of TVs, bulbs and fans) lured me and others into coming to US on H1. They promised they will apply for permanent residency in 6 months. The company couldn't survive the consultancy business and folded operations by end 2000 and my application evaporated into the air.
Post 9/11, and at the height of tech and internet bubble, I was laid off by that company in their operations closing in late 2001. I also lost my Canadian permanent residency (because I stayed away from that country form more that 180 days). I was lucky enough to get a decent job in late 2001. This large global company is a gem of its own; they also promised they will apply GC in 3 months. Thus my PD is EB3 Nov 2001.
I am always for writing one's experiences so that others know how to avoid them, if they are smart enough. That's all I have got.
Hi Learning01,
I did not want to "steal" your idea about publicity of the problem back in our countries. I just developed and enhanced the idea :-)
And I do not think we should be ashamed of the fact that this great country screwed us and made more than half a million highly educated and trained people (spouses included) chasing for a decade a mirage called GC and looking like idiots.
....
:-)
more...
house justin bieber with his shirt
pappu
12-16 12:05 PM
How are unused visas used?
Unused visas mean they are not used. :D
Unused visas mean they are not used. :D
tattoo These Justin Bieber Shirtless
Dandruff
05-30 06:18 PM
pwned ... hehehe :D
more...
pictures justin bieber barcelona shirt.
rb_248
09-11 01:15 PM
The frustration in the EB3 community is very intense. I hate to see this become a feud between EB3 and EB2. We all are in this together. Please stop hating. Just 1 post brought my reputation down from 4 greens to 2 reds.
dresses tattoo Justin Bieber 2010
dewdrop
07-19 03:31 PM
Another thought i had was...Before all of us june,july,august folks land up in the blackhole of FBI namechecks...Can we lobby for some kind of transparency?What in the world can make them take 4 yrs to check a persons name?Can they at least maintain a website that they update as and when a name check is completed...Please core and members,do something about this...something as effective as the campaign to accept july applicants!!while they are overhauling the system let them get it right all the way!!
more...
makeup justin bieber shirt off abs.
retropain
08-31 09:04 AM
if only we knew about this program in advance, we could've called. :mad:
girlfriend New Justin Bieber T-Shirt?
laksmi
02-17 07:33 PM
Yes you can include your spouse to 485 when dates are current and is not dependent on H1B transfer.
hairstyles shirt off. justin bieber
kiran_k02
03-22 09:38 PM
Hello,
Yes, as my PD is Feb 2005, this implies that the case has been pre-adjudicated as of now pending new finger prints.
My case was originally at NSC, was then send to MSC (National Benefits Center) and then was sent to local USCIS office in San Francisco where I went for an interview and then had this request for documents. The processing dates for San Francisco field office as of now for I-485 are Aug 1, 2008. So, I'm assuming that they have cleared all the cases that reached them by 31 July 2008 and that NSC sent my case file to them by 31st July 2008.
The IO who interviewed me was different than the one who has worked on my case since.
Yes, thanks for the wishes...but in this process, nothing is certain till the physical receipt of the cards, right? :)
PS: As far as I know, fingerprints and medical records are the two documents that may expire...apart from the applicant! ;)
Good reminder to all of us, which we keep forgetting (about our own expiry) :).
Anyway, I would suggest to cut short your trip if possible and finish this pending work ASAP.
In any case, my wishes are with you, even though you are cutting the line :).
Yes, as my PD is Feb 2005, this implies that the case has been pre-adjudicated as of now pending new finger prints.
My case was originally at NSC, was then send to MSC (National Benefits Center) and then was sent to local USCIS office in San Francisco where I went for an interview and then had this request for documents. The processing dates for San Francisco field office as of now for I-485 are Aug 1, 2008. So, I'm assuming that they have cleared all the cases that reached them by 31 July 2008 and that NSC sent my case file to them by 31st July 2008.
The IO who interviewed me was different than the one who has worked on my case since.
Yes, thanks for the wishes...but in this process, nothing is certain till the physical receipt of the cards, right? :)
PS: As far as I know, fingerprints and medical records are the two documents that may expire...apart from the applicant! ;)
Good reminder to all of us, which we keep forgetting (about our own expiry) :).
Anyway, I would suggest to cut short your trip if possible and finish this pending work ASAP.
In any case, my wishes are with you, even though you are cutting the line :).
zen
03-23 07:27 AM
They might thinking to deport you asap!!!!!!!! Just kidding!!! I dont have much hope from these guys. My finger print medical expired last year and I didn't get any letter or call.
Anyway having + Attitude and is good thing.
just wondering, how do you know when your medical and FP expires ?
I hope they will ask us to go through that pain only when they are about to approve a case (just imagine the mess ..if GC takes 10 years and they ask to go medical every 2 years)
Anyway having + Attitude and is good thing.
just wondering, how do you know when your medical and FP expires ?
I hope they will ask us to go through that pain only when they are about to approve a case (just imagine the mess ..if GC takes 10 years and they ask to go medical every 2 years)
eagerr2i
02-07 04:02 PM
This came in the newswire today about the challenges being faced in UK amongst the people who entered UK under the high skilled immigration program. Do do our stories in US have any similarity here?
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Disenfranchised_Indians_take_to_streets_in_London/articleshow/msid-1142198,curpg-1.cms
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Disenfranchised_Indians_take_to_streets_in_London/articleshow/msid-1142198,curpg-1.cms
No comments:
Post a Comment